
Objective
The objective of the Technical Safety
Review of Accident Management (TSR-AM) provides a comprehensive framework for external
independent review of the procedures and guidelines to be put in place for all
operational activities significant to safety and for responding to anticipated
operational occurrences and to accident conditions, including the following accident
management programme (AMP) elements:
-
Implementation
of organisational measures to prevent and to mitigate consequences of
accidents, irrespective of their frequency of occurrence or of the fission
product releases considered in the design envelope.
-
Consistency
with the plant design and its current configuration. Consideration of all plant
states and modes of operation and all fuel locations, including the spent fuel
storage, and possible combinations of events that could lead to an accident.
-
Consideration
of potential external hazards more severe than those considered in the design,
derived from the site hazard evaluation, that could result in significant
damage to the infrastructure on the site or off the site which would hinder
actions needed to prevent or mitigate significant degradation of the fuel rods.
-
Consideration
of potential interactions between units and consideration of concurrent
accidents affecting all units for multi-unit sites.
-
Evidence
of periodical review and revisions of AMP, when appropriate, to reflect
operating experience (including major lessons identified), changes of plant
configuration and new results from relevant international research (e.g. the
periodic review of the accident management programme may be accomplished as
part of the periodic safety review (PSR) of the plant).
Scope of the review
The scope of the review is defined by the Requesting Party in consultation
with the IAEA. Scope of TSR-AM, for example, could be defined for the whole AMP
including review of:
-
The
whole concept of an accident management programme;
-
The
main principles and organization;
-
The
format and content of accident management guidance;
-
The
verification and validation of the accident management programme;
-
The
accident management and external hazards;
-
The
accident management for multi-unit sites (if applicable);
-
The
equipment upgrades (e.g. mobile);
-
The
roles and responsibilities;
-
The
staffing, qualification, training and working conditions for accident
management.
-
Alternatively, the review could be focused on smaller different areas and AMP elements, such as the
review of:
-
Specific
types of procedures (EOPs) OR guidelines (SAMGs) (content, credited SSCs,
verification and validation, staff response…);
-
The
supporting accident analyses or other background bases documents (e.g. set
point study, survivability/accessibility analyses, etc.);
-
The
Human Machine Interface (HMI) in TSC/ECR;
-
The
training, exercise and drills programs and participation/observation on
exercises and drills.
-
In addition to the
AMP documentation itself, the Requesting Party should provide appropriate level
of background documentation as technical bases for the scope of the AMP to be
reviewed. This documentation should describe and explain the rationale of the
various parts of the AMP. If generic technical bases were used (e.g. PWROG
generic documentation for the development of plant specific EOPs or/and SAMGs),
AMP implementation process (e.g. plant specific hazards and vulnerabilities
identification, identification of plant capabilities, etc.) should be described
and any deviations from plant operating requirements and generic bases
identified and justified. Other plant documentation (e.g. FSAR, system flow
diagrams and system design descriptions of credited
systems/components/structures in AMP, list and description of credited
non-permanent (portable or mobile) equipment, Level 1 and Level 2 PSA
studies/reports, accident modeling and simulation reports, applicable training
and programmes for periodic drills, periodic review of AM, etc.) should be
available during the review process, if necessary based on the agreed scope of
the review. The Requesting Party can send an executive summary of the technical
basis reports (including generic one) used during the development of the AMP,
referenced plant specific studies and analyses in advance for better
understanding and accelerated review by the IAEA Technical Team.
The framework of
TSR-AM review is based on the following set of applicable IAEA Safety Standards:
-
Fundamental
Safety Principles (IAEA Safety Standard Series SF-1)
-
Safety
Requirements on Leadership and Management for Safety (IAEA Safety Standard
Series No. GSR Part 2)
-
Safety
Requirements on Safety Assessment for Facilities and Activities (IAEA Safety
Standard Series No. GSR Part 4 (rev.1))
-
Safety
Requirements on Emergency Preparedness and Response (IAEA Safety Standard
Series No. GSR Part 7
-
Safety
Requirements Safety on Safety of Nuclear Power Plants: Design (Specific Safety
Requirements No. SSR-2/1(Rev. 1))
-
Safety
Requirements Safety on Safety of Nuclear Power Plants: Commissioning and
Operation (Specific Safety Requirements No. SSR-2/2(Rev. 1))
-
Specific
Safety Guide on Accident Management Programmes for Nuclear Power Plants
(SSG-54)
Benefits
The
TSR-PSR offers interested Member States a number of benefits including:
-
Experts
invited to carry out the mission are internationally respected and independent
with no conflict of interest with the Requesting Party, which ensures respect
for the findings and provides assurance that recommendations will be addressed
by the Requesting Party.
-
Respected
and independent review increases confidence of all stakeholders (including
public), both local and international, that the accident management programme,
as developed and implemented at the nuclear installation in question meets all
relevant international requirements and ensures the highest Safety Standards
that can reasonably be achieved.
-
Undertaking
the TSR-AM Service ensures that gaps in the addressing of safety requirements within
the framework of reviewed accident management programme were identified and
adequate attention was paid to available good practices.
-
Results
of comprehensive AMP assessment provided by IAEA TSR-AM Service provide
reliable and valuable information for use in discussions and justification of
the adequacy of accident management programme implemented at the nuclear
installation and its enhancements to regulators.
-
The
process and results of TSR-AM Service could be useful to Requesting Party to
understand the latest interpretation of requirements posed on current accident
management programmes and current best practices, in order to meet them and to help
entities responsible for AMP at the Requesting Party to avoid false
interpretation of relevant AMP concepts and requirements.
-
The
TSR-AM Service can be undertaken with an AMP Technical Bases Documentation and
potential issues could be identified before the start of the development and
implementation of AMP thus avoiding resource losses and threat to deadlines.
-
Follow
up missions can be requested to explore identified issues in more depth and
provide assurance that actions taken to address the TSR-AM Service results are
adequate and that the AMP in place is sound.
AM Reviews Conduceted
#
|
Service
|
Member State
|
Year
|
9
|
AM programme of
Laguna Verde
|
Mexico
|
2014
|
8
|
AM programme of
Ignalina
|
Lithuania
|
2007
|
7
|
AM programme of
KANUPP
|
Pakistan
|
2007
|
6
|
AM programme of
Chinese PWR
|
China
|
2007
|
5
|
AM programme of
CERNAVODA
|
Romania
|
2007
|
4
|
AM programme of
Chasma
|
Pakistan
|
2006
|
3
|
AM programme of
Chinese PWR
|
China
|
2006
|
2
|
AM programme of
KANUPP
|
Pakistan
|
2004
|
1
|
AM programme of
Krisko
|
Slovenia
|
2001
|